Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Mouche vs. Diorama

    Mouche by Rochas bottle

    Mouche

    Rochas
    Eau de Parfum1947
    Very similar
    New comparison

    Diorama rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Mouche vs. Diorama
    MoucheDiorama
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Parfum
    Launched19471948
    GenderFemaleFemale
    PerfumerEdmond RoudnitskaEdmond Roudnitska
    Best seasonFallFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Mouche

    Amber
    Woody
    Sweet
    Fruity
    Earthy
    Powdery
    Warm Spicy
    Balsamic

    Diorama

    White Floral
    Woody
    Animalic
    Fruity
    Powdery
    Leather
    Fresh Spicy
    Musky

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    PeachApricotLemonBergamotNarcissus
    PlumPeachMelonBergamot
    Heart
    PlumRoseYlang-YlangJasmineCarnationHoneyCloveSweet PeaHeliotrope
    GardeniaJasmineTuberoseRoseCinnamonCarawayVioletBlack PepperNutmegCloveLily of the Valley
    Base
    OpoponaxOakmossBenzoinPatchouliVetiverLeatherMuskOrris RootSandalwoodAmbergrisVanilla
    OakmossCivetCastoreumLeatherVetiverSandalwoodMuskCedarwood

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Mouche vs. Diorama
    MoucheDiorama
    Score3.5/54/5
    Longevity4-6 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Edmond Roudnitska built Mouche for the wearer who doesn't need the room to know she's there. Nine heart notes could be chaos. On his wrist, it became architecture. Find the vintage. Wear it once.Mouche
    This is the vintage Dior that collectors chase. Animalic, powdery, and built on a foundation of civet and oakmoss that modern perfumery almost never attempts anymore.Diorama