
Field of Flowers
PhilosophyEau de Toilette2010
Side by side


Field of Flowers rates higher with the community, while Pretty wears longer on skin.
The essentials
| Field of Flowers | Pretty | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2010 | 2009 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | — | Claude Dir |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Field of Flowers
Pretty
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| Field of Flowers | Pretty | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
Philosophy built this for the woman who wants scent to belong to her skin, not announce her arrival. No sillage theater. The peony stays close, intimate.Field of Flowers
If you want a fragrance that announces itself with cheerful fruit and settles into something quietly confident, Pretty fits the bill. That is its quiet charm.Pretty
The hunt
| Field of Flowers | Pretty | |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 oz | — | $18.89fragrancenet |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.