Skip to main content
    HousesNotesPerfumers

    Side by side

    Paul Smith Men vs. Polo Crest

    Moderately similar
    New comparison

    Polo Crest rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Paul Smith Men vs. Polo Crest
    Paul Smith MenPolo Crest
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Toilette
    Launched20001991
    GenderMaleMale
    PerfumerAlain Astori, Nathalie Lorson—
    Best seasonSpringFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Paul Smith Men

    Fresh Spicy
    Aromatic
    Citrus
    Green
    Ozonic
    Aquatic
    Woody
    Earthy

    Polo Crest

    Aromatic
    Fresh Spicy
    Woody
    Leather
    Herbal
    Mossy
    Green
    Earthy

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    BasilBergamotOrangeLavender
    BasilArtemisiaRosemaryBergamotJuniper Berries
    Heart
    Violet LeafHyacinthGeraniumGinger Leaf
    Pine Tree NeedlesCarawayCarnationJasmineGeraniumRose
    Base
    VetiverMuskSandalwoodOakmoss
    OakmossLeatherCedarPatchouliMuskAmber

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Paul Smith Men vs. Polo Crest
    Paul Smith MenPolo Crest
    Score3.5/54/5
    Longevity4-6 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Some fragrances announce themselves. This one waits for you to lean in. Not weak, present. Built for the kind of confidence that doesn't need a room to notice it.Paul Smith Men
    Polo Crest doesn't play it safe. The artemisia bites, the oakmoss grounds it, and nothing here is trying to please you. It's old-money confidence, the kind that doesn't explain itself.Polo Crest