
Siren
Paris HiltonEau de Parfum2009
Side by side
Siren wears longer on skin, while Daniel de Fasson projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Siren | Daniel de Fasson | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2009 | 1990 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Honorine Blanc | — |
| Best season | — | Fall |
Scent DNA
Siren
Daniel de Fasson
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Siren | Daniel de Fasson | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
It's light. Deliberately. Built for the woman who doesn't need a room to know she's there. The sweetness reads as warmth, not sugar, and the sillage stays intimate, close enough to notice.Siren
The smoke here isn't campfire, it's incense and dark honey, sweet enough to seduce but grounded enough to stay. This is for the person who wants their scent to leave a trace.Daniel de Fasson
Keep comparing
Good to know