
Paco
Paco RabanneEau de Toilette1996
Side by side
White Tag rates higher with the community, while Paco wears longer on skin.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Paco | White Tag | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1996 | 2015 |
| Gender | Unisex | Male |
| Perfumer | Rosendo Mateu | — |
| Best season | — | Spring |
Scent DNA
Paco
White Tag
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| Paco | White Tag | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Paco from 1996 has a green, slightly bitter quality that sets it apart from many contemporary tea fragrances. The tea note brings a grounded herbal character rather than the sweeter.Paco
For something discontinued, it holds up. The longevity means reapplication if you need it through dinner, but the tea-floral heart that lingers is worth the tradeoff.White Tag
Good to know