
Pour Homme
Omar Sharif1992
Side by side
L'Homme rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Pour Homme projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Pour Homme | L'Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | — | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1992 | 1979 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Pour Homme
L'Homme
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Pour Homme | L'Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
This isn't a safe blind buy. The opening is confrontational, aldehydes, artemisia, and a green intensity that hits like a 1992 cinema trailer before the feature.Pour Homme
Built for the man who's already in the room. The citrus and mint open with immediate energy, but it's the amber-wood drydown that earns the reputation. Moderate projection, quietly confident.L'Homme
The hunt
| Pour Homme | L'Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| 1.7 oz | $96.03ecosmetics | — |
| 3.4 oz | $81.95fragranceshop | — |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Keep comparing
Good to know