
Pour Homme
Omar Sharif1992
Side by side
Drakkar Noir rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Pour Homme projects louder.
The essentials
| Pour Homme | Drakkar Noir | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | — | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1992 | 1982 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | — | Pierre Wargnye |
| Best season | Fall | — |
Scent DNA
Pour Homme
Drakkar Noir
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| Pour Homme | Drakkar Noir | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
This isn't a safe blind buy. The opening is confrontational, aldehydes, artemisia, and a green intensity that hits like a 1992 cinema trailer before the feature.Pour Homme
This fragrance has opinions. The 1982 lavender-mint opening either speaks to you or it doesn't, and for those it speaks to, nothing else fills the same space.Drakkar Noir
The hunt
| Pour Homme | Drakkar Noir | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 oz | — | $16.66ecosmetics |
| 1.7 oz | $96.03ecosmetics | $19.07ecosmetics |
| 3.4 oz | $81.95fragranceshop | $15.57ecosmetics |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.