Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Michael for Men vs. London for Men

    Clearly related
    New comparison

    Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Michael for Men vs. London for Men
    Michael for MenLondon for Men
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Toilette
    Launched20012006
    GenderMaleMale
    PerfumerHarry FrémontAntoine Maisondieu
    Best seasonWinter

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Michael for Men

    Sweet
    Woody
    Tobacco
    Warm Spicy
    Fruity

    London for Men

    Tobacco
    Cinnamon
    Sweet
    Warm Spicy
    Woody
    Leather
    Lavender
    Mossy

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    Star AniseElemi ResinBergamotCardamomCorianderThymeTarragon
    CinnamonLavenderBergamot
    Heart
    SuedeFrankincensePipe tobacco
    LeatherMimosa
    Base
    SandalwoodPatchouliPlumDried Fruits
    Tobacco LeafGuaiac WoodOakmossMyrrh

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Michael for Men vs. London for Men
    Michael for MenLondon for Men
    Score4/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Not for those who play it safe. The star anise opening is bold and unapologetic, a statement that doesn't ask permission. This is a fragrance that gets noticed and remembered.Michael for Men
    London for Men doesn't try to be revolutionary. It delivers what it promises: a structured, masculine composition with genuine depth. The leather-mimosa heart surprises, and the drydown rewards.London for Men