Marc O'Polo Midsummer Man
Marc O'PoloEau de Toilette2004
Side by side
Marc O'Polo Midsummer Man vs. Gucci pour Homme (2003)
Gucci pour Homme (2003) rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Marc O'Polo Midsummer Man projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| Marc O'Polo Midsummer Man | Gucci pour Homme (2003) | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2004 | 2003 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | — | Michel Almairac |
| Best season | Fall | Winter |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Marc O'Polo Midsummer Man
Citrus
Warm Spicy
Woody
Aromatic
Powdery
Vanilla
Amber
Rum
Gucci pour Homme (2003)
Woody
Amber
Smoky
Aromatic
Warm Spicy
Balsamic
Leather
Powdery
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Mandarin OrangeLemonCardamomVioletBasil
ArtemisiaBasilBergamotLavenderLemonPetitgrainGinger
Heart
RumRed PaprikaLavenderGeranium
CedarwoodPink PepperSandalwoodPatchouliOrris RootCarnationGeraniumJasmine
Base
SandalwoodAmberVanillaOakmossCedarVetiver
IncenseLeatherAmberVetiverLabdanumVanillaOakmossTonka BeanMuskSage
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Marc O'Polo Midsummer Man | Gucci pour Homme (2003) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
The rum-lavender combo walks into a bar and orders something nobody else has heard of. Sweet enough to pull you in, dry enough to keep you guessing. That's the whole appeal.Marc O'Polo Midsummer Man
Gucci pour Homme does not try to impress, and that restraint is exactly why it works. The woody-amber drydown with frankincense and vetiver feels expensive without being loud.Gucci pour Homme (2003)