Skip to main content
    Silloria
    BrandsNotesPerfumers
    Log inSign up

    Side by side

    Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016 vs. Masaki Shiro

    Very similar
    New comparison

    Is Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016 better than Masaki Shiro?

    Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.

    Why this score
    Performance proximity
    Accord profile overlap
    Shared notes
    Cotton FlowerMusk
    powderywoodymuskyfreshfloral

    This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.

    The essentials

    What's different between Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016 and Masaki Shiro?

    Key facts: Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016 vs. Masaki Shiro
    Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016Masaki Shiro
    ConcentrationEau de Toilette—
    Launched20162010
    GenderUnisexFemale
    PerfumerSteven Claisse—
    Best seasonSpringSpring

    Scent DNA

    How do Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016 and Masaki Shiro smell?

    Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016

    Powdery
    Citrus
    Aquatic
    Woody
    Musky
    Fresh
    Floral
    White Floral

    Masaki Shiro

    Powdery
    Floral
    Musky
    Iris
    Woody
    Fresh

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    What notes do Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016 and Masaki Shiro share?

    Top
    Aquatic NotesBergamotWhite PeachMandarin Orange
    Cotton FlowerCyclamen
    Heart
    Cotton FlowerLavenderJasmineLily of the Valley
    IrisRose
    Base
    MuskWoody NotesSuedeSandalwood
    White MuskPine

    Notes both fragrances share

    Shared note families

    Floral Notes
    Cotton FlowerLavenderJasmineLily of the Valley
    Cotton FlowerIrisCyclamenRose
    Woody Notes
    Woody NotesSandalwood
    Pine
    Musk
    Musk
    White Musk

    Where they fit

    When and where do Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016 and Masaki Shiro work?

    Spring
    Summer
    Fall
    Winter

    Community taste

    Which performs better, Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016 or Masaki Shiro?

    Community verdict: Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016 vs. Masaki Shiro
    Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016Masaki Shiro
    Score3.5/53.5/5
    Longevity4-6 hours4-6 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    What do reviewers say about Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016 and Masaki Shiro?

    Fresh without the antiseptic edge. This is the clean that smells like a decision, not a cleaning product. The cotton doesn't shout, it whispers. And somehow that restraint is exactly why it works.Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016
    Shiro is quiet in the best possible way. It performs softly, which means reapplication is part of the ritual. The iris and white musk combination works especially well if you prefer subtlety over.Masaki Shiro

    Keep comparing

    More comparisons to explore

    Noa bottleMarc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016vsNoa78%Sun Bleached bottleMarc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016vsSun Bleached78%Pure Soap bottleMarc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016vsPure Soap78%Clean Skin bottleMarc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016vsClean Skin78%Simply Cotton bottleMarc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016vsSimply Cotton78%Noa bottleMasaki ShirovsNoa77%Lacoste Pour Femme bottleMasaki ShirovsLacoste Pour Femme75%Bronze Goddess Eau de Parfum 2019 bottleMarc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016vsBronze Goddess Eau de Parfum 201974%

    Good to know

    About Marc Jacobs Cotton Splash 2016 vs. Masaki Shiro.