Ruby Woo
MAC2016
Side by side
Ruby Woo vs. Oud Saphir
Oud Saphir rates higher with the community.
The essentials
At a glance
| Ruby Woo | Oud Saphir | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | — | Eau de Cologne (EDC) |
| Launched | 2016 | 2015 |
| Gender | Female | Unisex |
| Perfumer | — | Jérôme Epinette |
| Best season | Winter | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Ruby Woo
Leather
Woody
Cherry
Powdery
Animalic
Violet
Musky
Sweet
Oud Saphir
Leather
Musky
Smoky
Oud
Soft Spicy
Floral
Powdery
Citrus
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
CherryPink PepperRed LeatherSaffron
BergamotPink PepperAmbrette Seed
Heart
SuedeIrisRoseViolet
SuedeViolet LeafJasmine
Base
MahoganySandalwood
OudBourbon VanillaChinese birchwood
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Ruby Woo | Oud Saphir | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Bold. Warm. The leather that stays. Ruby Woo doesn't hedge, it commits. If you're drawn to the leather-floral tension, this is the one that earns its confidence.Ruby Woo
A cologne with presence. The suede-oud pairing creates warmth and a worn-in quality, unexpectedly powdery. It's the kind of scent that gets remembered long after you've left the room.Oud Saphir