Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 2006 vs. Mugler Cologne

    Moderately similar
    New comparison

    Mugler Cologne rates higher with the community, while Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 2006 wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 2006 vs. Mugler Cologne
    Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 2006Mugler Cologne
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteCologne
    Launched20062001
    GenderMaleUnisex
    PerfumerAlberto Morillas
    Best seasonFallSummer

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 2006

    Woody
    Powdery
    Violet
    Soft Spicy
    Green
    Vanilla
    Sweet
    Fresh

    Mugler Cologne

    Citrus
    White Floral
    Green
    Fresh Spicy
    Aromatic
    Musky
    Powdery

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    RumIvy
    BergamotNeroliPetitgrain
    Heart
    VioletLicorice
    African Orange Flower
    Base
    VetiverVanillaRose HipCedarMusk
    Musk

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 2006 vs. Mugler Cologne
    Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 2006Mugler Cologne
    Score3.5/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours4-6 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Au Masculin smells like the end of a long night, violet, rum, and a conversation that went somewhere unexpected. The violet carries a powdery sweetness that feels almost candied.Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 2006
    Not every fragrance needs to announce itself. Mugler Cologne sits close, speaks softly, and lets you walk away with the memory of clean skin. If that sounds boring, you are probably not its person.Mugler Cologne