Laura Ashley No. 1
Laura AshleyEau de Parfum1979
Side by side
Laura Ashley No. 1 vs. Wet Garden
Laura Ashley No. 1 rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| Laura Ashley No. 1 | Wet Garden | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Cologne |
| Launched | 1979 | 2002 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Best season | Spring | Summer |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Laura Ashley No. 1
Green
White Floral
Floral
Fresh Spicy
Citrus
Warm Spicy
Mossy
Aromatic
Wet Garden
Aquatic
Floral
Earthy
Fresh
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
JasmineRoseCinnamonBasil
Rain Accord
Heart
HyacinthNarcissusOakmossGardeniaAfrican Orange FlowerBergamotPeachGalbanumCyclamenMuskCarnationOrchid
Aquatic Notes
Base
CedarIris
Earthy NotesFloral Notes
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Laura Ashley No. 1 | Wet Garden | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
This is the one for people who want white florals without the drama. Gardenia does the heavy lifting here, and it earns every spray. No. 1 doesn't push. It lingers. That's the whole point.Laura Ashley No. 1
Demeter builds fragrances from single ideas, and this one is the most literal of the bunch: a garden right after rain. That concept could go synthetic and flat, but Wet Garden earns its place.Wet Garden