
Wild Meadow
Kate MossEau de Parfum2010
Side by side
Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Wild Meadow | Daisy Garland | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2010 | 2010 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Shyamala Maisondieu | Alberto Morillas |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Wild Meadow
Daisy Garland
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| Wild Meadow | Daisy Garland | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Kate Moss built her brand on knowing when not to try too hard. Wild Meadow is that philosophy in a bottle: fresh, floral, quietly confident. No shouting. No projecting across the room.Wild Meadow
The violet-forward heart is distinctive. That's not a flaw. It's the whole point. Daisy Garland offers a cooler, more powdery take on florals, a composition that stands apart for those who appreciate.Daisy Garland
Good to know