
Sander for Men
Jil SanderEau de Toilette2000
Side by side
Montabaco rates higher with the community.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Sander for Men | Montabaco | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Parfum |
| Launched | 2000 | 2012 |
| Gender | Male | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Jacques Cavallier Belletrud | Geza Schön |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Sander for Men
Montabaco
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Sander for Men | Montabaco | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Jil Sander built a brand on subtraction. This scent is the result, nothing wasted, nothing showy. If you want a fragrance that argues, look elsewhere. If you want one that just works, here it is.Sander for Men
Montabaco rewards patience. The opening is excellent, but the real payoff is that suede-tobacco-sandalwood drydown. Give it time to breathe on your skin and it delivers something genuinely layered.Montabaco
Keep comparing
Good to know