Skip to main content
    Silloria
    BrandsNotesPerfumers
    Log inSign up

    Side by side

    Jil Sander No. 4 vs. Roccobarocco Black For Women

    Very similar
    New comparison

    Roccobarocco Black For Women wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Jil Sander No. 4 vs. Roccobarocco Black For Women
    Jil Sander No. 4Roccobarocco Black For Women
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Parfum
    Launched19902012
    GenderFemaleFemale
    PerfumerMichel AlmairacMaurizio Cerizza
    Best season—Fall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Jil Sander No. 4

    Powdery
    White Floral
    Woody
    Sweet
    Warm Spicy
    Tuberose
    Floral
    Animalic

    Roccobarocco Black For Women

    Fruity
    Tuberose
    Amber
    White Floral
    Floral
    Woody
    Sweet
    Vanilla

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    PlumGalbanumPeachGeraniumRoseStar AniseBergamot
    BergamotBlackcurrantQuince
    Heart
    TuberoseCarnationNutmegYlang-YlangJasmineMyrrhRoseHeliotropeTarragonViolet
    TuberoseMagnoliaYlang-Ylang
    Base
    CivetSandalwoodOakmossCorianderVanillaTonka BeanMuskPatchouliAmbergrisCedarwood
    AmberFrankincenseMyrrhPatchouliVanilla

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Jil Sander No. 4 vs. Roccobarocco Black For Women
    Jil Sander No. 4Roccobarocco Black For Women
    Score3.5/53.5/5
    Longevity4-6 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    This is a proper 1990s powerhouse. The galbanum opening might surprise those expecting typical florals, but the heart delivers generous white florals that justify its cult status.Jil Sander No. 4
    The powdery-sweet florals and smoky resin base shouldn't work together. They do. This is tuberose with real weight, not polite, not apologetic. If you're looking for something that asks nothing of.Roccobarocco Black For Women