Char
Henry RoseEau de Parfum2022
Side by side
Char vs. Matahari Di Bali
Char wears longer on skin, while Matahari Di Bali projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| Char | Matahari Di Bali | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | — |
| Launched | 2022 | 2023 |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Yves Cassar | Marc Zini |
| Best season | Fall | Summer |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Char
Amber
Aromatic
Woody
Vanilla
Earthy
Sweet
White Floral
Warm Spicy
Matahari Di Bali
Aromatic
Woody
Amber
Earthy
Warm Spicy
Green
Vanilla
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
LabdanumIvory Coast Ginger
Citron
Heart
Patchouli LeafAfrican Orange Flower
Siam Benzoin
Base
Vetiver
Vetiver
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Char | Matahari Di Bali | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
Most tonka fragrances overshoot. Char doesn't. The ginger keeps everything honest, a warmth that breathes rather than sits. Smoke and clarity coexisting. Char
For a fragrance that wears 'Bali' in its name, there's surprising restraint here. The citron doesn't tropicalize, it illuminates. The benzoin doesn't oversweeten, it soothes.Matahari Di Bali