Skip to main content
    HousesNotesPerfumers

    Side by side

    Giorgio for Men vs. Omniscent 0.96

    Moderately similar
    New comparison

    Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Giorgio for Men vs. Omniscent 0.96
    Giorgio for MenOmniscent 0.96
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Parfum
    Launched19842010
    GenderMaleFemale
    Perfumer—Yosh Han
    Best seasonFallFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Giorgio for Men

    Warm Spicy
    Woody
    Earthy
    Sweet
    Honey
    Amber
    Patchouli
    Floral

    Omniscent 0.96

    White Floral
    Warm Spicy
    Aromatic
    Green
    Sweet
    Fresh Spicy
    Woody
    Powdery

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    AldehydesOrangeBergamotFruity Notes
    GardeniaTunisian OpiumHempFig LeafBasilVioletLilac
    Heart
    PatchouliRoseCarnationCinnamonSandalwoodCedarwoodOrris Root
    Egyptian TuberoseCloveGeraniumPineappleKiwiPink Grapefruit
    Base
    HoneyOakmossAmberMuskVanillaBenzoinTonka Bean
    SandalwoodVanilla

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Giorgio for Men vs. Omniscent 0.96
    Giorgio for MenOmniscent 0.96
    Score4/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagestrongstrong

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Giorgio for Men does not whisper. It announces itself. The aldehydic lift over orange and allspice has an almost electric quality, while the patchouli-cinnamon heart brings unmistakable 80s power.Giorgio for Men
    The opening is confrontational. Not aggressive, just honest. Tuberose, gardenia, a little opium warmth. Then it settles into something wearable, but only after it's decided you're ready for it.Omniscent 0.96