Wild Breeze
George Gina & LucyEau de Toilette2013
Side by side
Wild Breeze vs. Escape for Men
Escape for Men wears longer on skin, while Wild Breeze projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| Wild Breeze | Escape for Men | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2013 | 1993 |
| Gender | Female | Male |
| Perfumer | — | Steve DeMercado, David Apel |
| Best season | Summer | Spring |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Wild Breeze
Fruity
Sand
Marine
Tropical
Aromatic
Mineral
Salty
Aquatic
Escape for Men
Woody
Aromatic
Fresh Spicy
Citrus
Fresh
Aquatic
Fruity
Marine
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Aquatic NotesCardamomStarfruit
—Heart
CyclamenHibiscus BlossomTiare Flower
Aquatic NotesPineBirchCypressRosemarySage
Base
MuskTonka BeanSand
—Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Wild Breeze | Escape for Men | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
If you've been burned by tropical fragrances that smell like bathroom spray, Wild Breeze is the exception. The starfruit and cardamom pairing gives it personality without going shrieky.Wild Breeze
If you want a fragrance that smells like a summer afternoon without trying too hard, this is it. The woody drydown keeps things from becoming cloying or overly sweet.Escape for Men