Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Gap Established 1969 for Men vs. Eternity For Men

    Clearly related
    New comparison

    Eternity For Men wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Gap Established 1969 for Men vs. Eternity For Men
    Gap Established 1969 for MenEternity For Men
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Parfum
    Launched20121990
    GenderMaleMale
    PerfumerRodrigo Flores-RouxCarlos Benaïm
    Best seasonFallSpring

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Gap Established 1969 for Men

    Green
    Aromatic
    Woody
    Powdery
    Citrus
    Leather
    Balsamic
    Musky

    Eternity For Men

    Aromatic
    Citrus
    Fresh Spicy
    Woody
    White Floral
    Lavender
    Herbal

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    NeroliCitronOrange Leaf
    Provençal lavenderLemonBergamotMandarin Orange
    Heart
    GalbanumArtemisiaWhite thyme
    SageJuniper BerriesBasilGeraniumJasmineCorianderOrange BlossomLily of the Valley
    Base
    SuedeSandalwoodCypress
    SandalwoodMuskVetiverBrazilian RosewoodAmber

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Gap Established 1969 for Men vs. Eternity For Men
    Gap Established 1969 for MenEternity For Men
    Score3.5/53.5/5
    Longevity4-6 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Some fragrances announce themselves. This one just shows up and fits. Galbanum gives it an herbal sharpness most people either love immediately or need twenty minutes to understand.Gap Established 1969 for Men
    This fragrance asks for patience. The citrus opening is brief and efficient, but what follows is a masterclass in masculine balance. Lavender, ambergris, and suede don't compete; they concede.Eternity For Men