
Hollywood for Men
Fred HaymanEau de Toilette1998
Side by side


Lalique Pour Homme wears longer on skin, while Hollywood for Men projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Hollywood for Men | Lalique Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1998 | 1997 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | — | Maurice Roucel |
| Best season | Fall | Winter |
Scent DNA
Hollywood for Men
Lalique Pour Homme
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Hollywood for Men | Lalique Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
Some will call the carnation bold. Some will call it wrong. Here's what the dissenters miss: a fragrance this distinctive makes a statement that safe compositions simply cannot.Hollywood for Men
Lalique Pour Homme is the rare fragrance that actually smells like it was designed by a chemist who respected tradition. The oakmoss and vanilla base is where this lives and dies.Lalique Pour Homme
Keep comparing
Hollywood for Menvs360° for Men84%
Lalique Pour HommevsAzzaro pour Homme82%
Lalique Pour HommevsEncre Noire Sport82%
Lalique Pour HommevsZino Davidoff82%
Lalique Pour HommevsEgoiste Platinum80%
Hollywood for MenvsPassion for Men78%
Hollywood for MenvsEau de Lacoste L.12.12 Eau Fraîche75%
Lalique Pour HommevsFahrenheit74%Good to know