Skip to main content
    HousesNotesPerfumers

    Side by side

    Pretty vs. Field of Flowers

    Pretty by Elizabeth Arden bottle

    Pretty

    Elizabeth Arden
    Eau de Parfum2009
    Clearly related
    New comparison

    Field of Flowers rates higher with the community, while Pretty wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Pretty vs. Field of Flowers
    PrettyField of Flowers
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Toilette
    Launched20092010
    GenderFemaleFemale
    PerfumerClaude Dir—
    Best seasonSpringSpring

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Pretty

    White Floral
    Floral
    Fresh
    Citrus
    Rose
    Fruity
    Powdery
    Musky

    Field of Flowers

    Floral
    Fresh
    Green
    Rose

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    Italian mandarine OrpurOrange BlossomPeach nectar
    Green Notes
    Heart
    White PeonyIrisStar JasminePetalia
    —
    Base
    MuskAmberJacaranda wood
    Floral NotesPeony

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Pretty vs. Field of Flowers
    PrettyField of Flowers
    Score3/53.5/5
    Longevity4-6 hours2-4 hours
    Sillagemoderatestrong

    No varnish

    Real talk

    If you want a fragrance that announces itself with cheerful fruit and settles into something quietly confident, Pretty fits the bill. That is its quiet charm.Pretty
    Philosophy built this for the woman who wants scent to belong to her skin, not announce her arrival. No sillage theater. The peony stays close, intimate.Field of Flowers

    The hunt

    Best price, size by size

    Best price by size: Pretty vs. Field of Flowers
    PrettyField of Flowers
    3.4 oz$18.89fragrancenet—

    Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.