Skip to main content

    Side by side

    LINK X Luca Maffei vs. 1872 For Women

    Very similar
    New comparison

    1872 For Women rates higher with the community.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: LINK X Luca Maffei vs. 1872 For Women
    LINK X Luca Maffei1872 For Women
    ConcentrationExtraitEau de Parfum
    Launched20251872
    GenderUnisexFemale
    PerfumerLuca MaffeiPatricia Choux
    Best seasonFallSpring

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    LINK X Luca Maffei

    Fresh Spicy
    Aromatic
    Citrus
    Woody
    Green
    White Floral
    Herbal
    Earthy

    1872 For Women

    Citrus
    Floral
    Woody
    Aromatic
    White Floral
    Powdery
    Fruity
    Fresh

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    BergamotGingerTimurCardamom
    BergamotLemonRosemaryMandarin OrangePineappleBlueberry
    Heart
    PetitgrainClary SageJasmineChamomile
    Lily of the ValleyVioletFreesiaOsmanthusRoseJasmineOrchid
    Base
    CedarwoodJava VetiverOakmossGalbanum
    OakmossCedarwoodMuskSandalwoodPatchouliGuaiac Wood

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: LINK X Luca Maffei vs. 1872 For Women
    LINK X Luca Maffei1872 For Women
    Score3.5/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    LINK doesn't play it safe. The Timur pepper keeps things interesting past the bergamot, the interplay between the bright citrus and that clean, metallic spice creating an unexpected edge.LINK X Luca Maffei
    This is not a subtle fragrance. The citrus burst hits hard initially, and the floral heart has real presence. The drydown rewards patience with oakmoss and cedarwood doing the heavy lifting.1872 For Women