Skip to main content
    Silloria
    BrandsNotesPerfumers
    Log inSign up

    Side by side

    LINK X Luca Maffei vs. 1872 For Men

    Very similar
    New comparison

    1872 For Men rates higher with the community.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: LINK X Luca Maffei vs. 1872 For Men
    LINK X Luca Maffei1872 For Men
    ConcentrationExtraitEau de Toilette
    Launched20252001
    GenderUnisexMale
    PerfumerLuca MaffeiGeza Schön
    Best seasonFall—

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    LINK X Luca Maffei

    Fresh Spicy
    Aromatic
    Citrus
    Woody
    Green
    White Floral
    Herbal
    Earthy

    1872 For Men

    Aromatic
    Fresh Spicy
    Citrus
    Woody
    Green
    Floral
    Sweet
    Balsamic

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    BergamotGingerTimurCardamom
    PetitgrainGrapefruitGalbanumBergamotLimeLavenderRosemaryBlack PepperNutmeg
    Heart
    PetitgrainClary SageJasmineChamomile
    Clary SageJasmineFreesiaCyclamenMarigold
    Base
    CedarwoodJava VetiverOakmossGalbanum
    CedarwoodFrankincensePatchouliMuskAmberLabdanum

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: LINK X Luca Maffei vs. 1872 For Men
    LINK X Luca Maffei1872 For Men
    Score3.5/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    LINK doesn't play it safe. The Timur pepper keeps things interesting past the bergamot, the interplay between the bright citrus and that clean, metallic spice creating an unexpected edge.LINK X Luca Maffei
    Geza Schön does not do simple. Even in a fragrance named for a royal warrant, there is intellectual rigor here. The citrus opening is not cheerful, it is precise.1872 For Men