
No. 1 Imperial For Women
Clive ChristianEau de Parfum2014
Side by side


Musc Eternel rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while No. 1 Imperial For Women projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| No. 1 Imperial For Women | Musc Eternel | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2014 | 2015 |
| Gender | Female | Unisex |
| Perfumer | — | Alberto Morillas |
| Best season | Spring | Fall |
Scent DNA
No. 1 Imperial For Women
Musc Eternel
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| No. 1 Imperial For Women | Musc Eternel | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
This is the concentrated version of No. 1 for Women, richer, deeper, more insistent. The 248-component original was already dense; the Imperial takes that and makes it thicker.No. 1 Imperial For Women
This is not a statement fragrance. Musc Eternel whispers when everything else in your collection shouts. If you want people to notice you from across the room, look elsewhere.Musc Eternel
Good to know