Skip to main content
    Silloria
    BrandsNotesPerfumers
    Log inSign up

    Side by side

    1872 For Women vs. LINK X Luca Maffei

    Very similar
    New comparison

    1872 For Women rates higher with the community.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: 1872 For Women vs. LINK X Luca Maffei
    1872 For WomenLINK X Luca Maffei
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumExtrait
    Launched18722025
    GenderFemaleUnisex
    PerfumerPatricia ChouxLuca Maffei
    Best seasonSpringFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    1872 For Women

    Citrus
    Floral
    Woody
    Aromatic
    White Floral
    Powdery
    Fruity
    Fresh

    LINK X Luca Maffei

    Fresh Spicy
    Aromatic
    Citrus
    Woody
    Green
    White Floral
    Herbal
    Earthy

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    BergamotLemonRosemaryMandarin OrangePineappleBlueberry
    BergamotGingerTimurCardamom
    Heart
    Lily of the ValleyVioletFreesiaOsmanthusRoseJasmineOrchid
    PetitgrainClary SageJasmineChamomile
    Base
    OakmossCedarwoodMuskSandalwoodPatchouliGuaiac Wood
    CedarwoodJava VetiverOakmossGalbanum

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: 1872 For Women vs. LINK X Luca Maffei
    1872 For WomenLINK X Luca Maffei
    Score4/53.5/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    This is not a subtle fragrance. The citrus burst hits hard initially, and the floral heart has real presence. The drydown rewards patience with oakmoss and cedarwood doing the heavy lifting.1872 For Women
    LINK doesn't play it safe. The Timur pepper keeps things interesting past the bergamot, the interplay between the bright citrus and that clean, metallic spice creating an unexpected edge.LINK X Luca Maffei