Skip to main content
    Silloria
    BrandsNotesPerfumers
    Log inSign up

    Side by side

    1872 For Men vs. Firence Eau de Parfum

    Very similar
    New comparison

    1872 For Men wears longer on skin, while Firence Eau de Parfum projects louder.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: 1872 For Men vs. Firence Eau de Parfum
    1872 For MenFirence Eau de Parfum
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Parfum
    Launched20012022
    GenderMaleMale
    PerfumerGeza Schön—
    Best season—Fall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    1872 For Men

    Aromatic
    Fresh Spicy
    Citrus
    Woody
    Green
    Floral
    Sweet
    Balsamic

    Firence Eau de Parfum

    Aromatic
    Fresh Spicy
    Citrus
    Woody
    Warm Spicy
    Green
    Earthy
    Herbal

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    PetitgrainGrapefruitGalbanumBergamotLimeLavenderRosemaryBlack PepperNutmeg
    BergamotPetitgrainBlack PepperNeroli
    Heart
    Clary SageJasmineFreesiaCyclamenMarigold
    Juniper BerriesLavenderCardamomSageIris
    Base
    CedarwoodFrankincensePatchouliMuskAmberLabdanum
    VetiverOakmossLeatherOud

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: 1872 For Men vs. Firence Eau de Parfum
    1872 For MenFirence Eau de Parfum
    Score4/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours4-6 hours
    Sillagemoderatestrong

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Geza Schön does not do simple. Even in a fragrance named for a royal warrant, there is intellectual rigor here. The citrus opening is not cheerful, it is precise.1872 For Men
    Clean citrus opening, yes, but underneath, leather and oud settle like a second skin. Vetiver breathes through the whole thing.Firence Eau de Parfum