1872 For Men
Clive ChristianEau de Toilette2001
Side by side
1872 For Men vs. Al Ameed
Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.
The essentials
At a glance
| 1872 For Men | Al Ameed | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | EDT |
| Launched | 2001 | 2022 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Geza Schön | — |
| Best season | — | Spring |
Scent DNA
Main accords
1872 For Men
Aromatic
Fresh Spicy
Citrus
Woody
Green
Floral
Sweet
Balsamic
Al Ameed
Leather
Aromatic
Fruity
Fresh Spicy
Sweet
Musky
Animalic
Citrus
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
PetitgrainGrapefruitGalbanumBergamotLimeLavenderRosemaryBlack PepperNutmeg
Clary SageMandarin Orange
Heart
Clary SageJasmineFreesiaCyclamenMarigold
Black PepperPineapple
Base
CedarwoodFrankincensePatchouliMuskAmberLabdanum
LeatherMusk
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| 1872 For Men | Al Ameed | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Geza Schön does not do simple. Even in a fragrance named for a royal warrant, there is intellectual rigor here. The citrus opening is not cheerful, it is precise.1872 For Men
This is the workhorse most collections need. Pineapple and leather together sounds unusual, but it works, sweet fruit grounded by worn leather. Good longevity, fair price, and it actually gets worn.Al Ameed