Skip to main content
    HousesNotesPerfumers

    Side by side

    33 vs. Himalaya

    33 by Chris Rusak bottle

    33

    Chris Rusak
    Eau de Parfum2018
    Clearly related
    New comparison

    Himalaya wears longer on skin, while 33 projects louder.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: 33 vs. Himalaya
    33Himalaya
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Toilette
    Launched20182002
    GenderUnisexMale
    PerfumerChris RusakOlivier Creed, Erwin Creed
    Best seasonFallSummer

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    33

    Woody
    Earthy
    Aromatic
    Green
    Warm Spicy
    Fresh
    Musky
    Soft Spicy

    Himalaya

    Citrus
    Woody
    Musky
    Powdery
    Fresh Spicy
    Amber
    Aromatic
    Animalic

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    FennelPaprika
    Calabrian bergamotBergamotGrapefruitLemonSicilian lemon
    Heart
    AngelicaCypriol
    Sandalwood
    Base
    VetiverOrris RootHyraceum
    MuskAmbergrisCedar

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: 33 vs. Himalaya
    33Himalaya
    Score4/54/5
    Longevity4-6 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagestrongmoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    This isn't a fragrance that shows off. Vetiver and iris doing something interesting without needing everyone to notice. Earthy, slightly medicinal, quietly confident.33
    Himalaya is what Creed makes when it stops trying to impress and starts trying to belong. No Aventus drama, no flankers fighting for attention. Just a clean, office-safe.Himalaya

    The hunt

    Best price, size by size

    Best price by size: 33 vs. Himalaya
    33Himalaya
    3.3 oz—$204.95fragranceshop

    Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.