
Chloé Narcisse
ChloéEau de Toilette1992
Side by side


Red Hibiscus Cologne Intense rates higher with the community, while Chloé Narcisse projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Chloé Narcisse | Red Hibiscus Cologne Intense | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Intense |
| Launched | 1992 | 2021 |
| Gender | Female | Unisex |
| Perfumer | — | Mathilde Bijaoui |
| Best season | Fall | Spring |
Scent DNA
Chloé Narcisse
Red Hibiscus Cologne Intense
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Chloé Narcisse | Red Hibiscus Cologne Intense | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
It's the bitter note that makes Narcisse worth knowing. Everyone expects another sweet floral, and it is, until it isn't. The daffodil adds something unexpected.Chloé Narcisse
Jo Malone London is known for restraint. This is the exception that proves the rule. The 'Intense' in the name isn't just branding, the vanilla here has weight, the florals have presence.Red Hibiscus Cologne Intense
The hunt
| Chloé Narcisse | Red Hibiscus Cologne Intense | |
|---|---|---|
| 1.7 oz | — | $165.24ecosmetics |
| 100ml | — | $185.49fragrancenet |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Keep comparing
Good to know