Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Eternity For Men vs. Gap Established 1969 for Men

    Clearly related
    New comparison

    Eternity For Men wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Eternity For Men vs. Gap Established 1969 for Men
    Eternity For MenGap Established 1969 for Men
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Toilette
    Launched19902012
    GenderMaleMale
    PerfumerCarlos BenaïmRodrigo Flores-Roux
    Best seasonSpringFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Eternity For Men

    Aromatic
    Citrus
    Fresh Spicy
    Woody
    White Floral
    Lavender
    Herbal

    Gap Established 1969 for Men

    Green
    Aromatic
    Woody
    Powdery
    Citrus
    Leather
    Balsamic
    Musky

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    Provençal lavenderLemonBergamotMandarin Orange
    NeroliCitronOrange Leaf
    Heart
    SageJuniper BerriesBasilGeraniumJasmineCorianderOrange BlossomLily of the Valley
    GalbanumArtemisiaWhite thyme
    Base
    SandalwoodMuskVetiverBrazilian RosewoodAmber
    SuedeSandalwoodCypress

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Eternity For Men vs. Gap Established 1969 for Men
    Eternity For MenGap Established 1969 for Men
    Score3.5/53.5/5
    Longevity6-10 hours4-6 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    This fragrance asks for patience. The citrus opening is brief and efficient, but what follows is a masterclass in masculine balance. Lavender, ambergris, and suede don't compete; they concede.Eternity For Men
    Some fragrances announce themselves. This one just shows up and fits. Galbanum gives it an herbal sharpness most people either love immediately or need twenty minutes to understand.Gap Established 1969 for Men