
Noa
CacharelEau de Toilette1998
Side by side


Noa rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while First Pour l'Ete projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Noa | First Pour l'Ete | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1998 | 2001 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Olivier Cresp | — |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Noa
First Pour l'Ete
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| Noa | First Pour l'Ete | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Some fragrances announce themselves. Noa doesn't need to. The coffee note gives it warmth where others go linear, and that powdery finish keeps drawing you back. Weightless, yes.Noa
Aldehydes meet white florals in an uncomplicated summer composition. Peony and lily give it body without layers. Cedar drydown is quiet rather than dramatic.First Pour l'Ete
The hunt
| Noa | First Pour l'Ete | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 oz | $17.95fragranceshop | — |
| 1.7 oz | $22.95fragranceshop | — |
| 3.4 oz | $23.95fragranceshop | — |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Good to know