London for Men
BurberryEau de Toilette2006
Side by side
London for Men vs. Michael for Men
Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.
The essentials
At a glance
| London for Men | Michael for Men | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2006 | 2001 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Antoine Maisondieu | Harry Frémont |
| Best season | Winter | — |
Scent DNA
Main accords
London for Men
Tobacco
Cinnamon
Sweet
Warm Spicy
Woody
Leather
Lavender
Mossy
Michael for Men
Sweet
Woody
Tobacco
Warm Spicy
Fruity
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
CinnamonLavenderBergamot
Star AniseElemi ResinBergamotCardamomCorianderThymeTarragon
Heart
LeatherMimosa
SuedeFrankincensePipe tobacco
Base
Tobacco LeafGuaiac WoodOakmossMyrrh
SandalwoodPatchouliPlumDried Fruits
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| London for Men | Michael for Men | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
London for Men doesn't try to be revolutionary. It delivers what it promises: a structured, masculine composition with genuine depth. The leather-mimosa heart surprises, and the drydown rewards.London for Men
Not for those who play it safe. The star anise opening is bold and unapologetic, a statement that doesn't ask permission. This is a fragrance that gets noticed and remembered.Michael for Men