
London for Men
BurberryEau de Toilette2006
Side by side
London for Men rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Mister projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| London for Men | Mister | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | — |
| Launched | 2006 | 2007 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Antoine Maisondieu | — |
| Best season | Winter | Fall |
Scent DNA
London for Men
Mister
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| London for Men | Mister | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
London for Men doesn't try to be revolutionary. It delivers what it promises: a structured, masculine composition with genuine depth. The leather-mimosa heart surprises, and the drydown rewards.London for Men
Here's the thing about this one: it sits in the gap. Not loud enough for the gym, not sweet enough to be another tobacco designer flanker. The herbs and tobacco together create a kind of late-evening.Mister
Keep comparing
Good to know