Michelle
BalenciagaEau de Toilette1979
Side by side
Michelle vs. Jasmine & Tuberose
Michelle rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Jasmine & Tuberose projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| Michelle | Jasmine & Tuberose | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 1979 | 2004 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Françoise Caron | — |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Michelle
White Floral
Woody
Tuberose
Green
Sweet
Powdery
Floral
Vanilla
Jasmine & Tuberose
White Floral
Tuberose
Animalic
Rose
Floral
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
GardeniaGreen NotesCoconutAldehydesPeach
—Heart
TuberoseYlang-YlangCarnationJasmineIrisRoseOrchid
—Base
OakmossVanillaBenzoinMuskSandalwoodVetiver
RoseJasmineTuberose
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Michelle | Jasmine & Tuberose | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
The aldehydes here aren't nostalgia. They're a challenge. Coconut and gardenia warm the opening until you can't tell if you're smelling a 1979 perfume or a timeless one.Michelle
Most white florals play it safe. This one leans into what makes tuberose actually interesting, that slightly feral quality underneath all the cream. It's not polite. It's not trying to be.Jasmine & Tuberose