Ho Hang
BalenciagaEau de Toilette1972
Side by side
Ho Hang vs. Men's Club
Men's Club rates higher with the community, while Ho Hang wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| Ho Hang | Men's Club | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Cologne |
| Launched | 1972 | 1966 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Raymond Chaillan | — |
| Best season | Winter | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Ho Hang
Amber
Aromatic
Fresh Spicy
Woody
Warm Spicy
Citrus
Vanilla
Balsamic
Men's Club
Musky
White Floral
Warm Spicy
Powdery
Animalic
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
LavenderBergamotBasilOrangeLemon
BergamotAldehydesJuniperBay LeafTarragon
Heart
RosewoodCarnationGeraniumPatchouliCedar
JasmineLabdanumCarnationCorianderIris
Base
LabdanumBenzoinVanillaTonka BeanAmberMusk
MuskCedarwoodFrankincenseMossPatchouliTonka BeanVetiver
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Ho Hang | Men's Club | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
This was never the entrance fragrance. It's the one that lingers after everyone else has left. A 1972 Balenciaga that rewards patience, woody-spicy warmth that builds quietly, earned and understated.Ho Hang
Here's the thing about Men's Club: it has that aldehydic brightness that gives it a classic polish, a mid-century refinement that feels timeless. The aldehydes lift the composition into something.Men's Club