Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Twin for Women vs. Noa

    Clearly related
    Noa by Cacharel bottle

    Noa

    Cacharel
    Eau de Toilette1998
    New comparison

    Noa rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Twin for Women vs. Noa
    Twin for WomenNoa
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Toilette
    Launched20081998
    GenderFemaleFemale
    PerfumerAnnick MenardoOlivier Cresp
    Best seasonSpringSpring

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Twin for Women

    Powdery
    Fruity
    Musky
    Almond
    Iris
    Nutty
    Sweet
    Rose

    Noa

    Floral
    Musky
    White Floral
    Powdery
    Fresh
    Green
    Woody
    Vanilla

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    PeachRose
    White MuskPeonyFreesiaGreen NotesPeachPlum
    Heart
    Almond BlossomIris
    Lily of the ValleyGreen GrassJasmineYlang-YlangRose
    Base
    Musk
    CoffeeVanillaSandalwoodCorianderIncenseTonka BeanCedar

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Twin for Women vs. Noa
    Twin for WomenNoa
    Score3.5/54/5
    Longevity4-6 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    The almond is what separates this from every other powdery floral in the case. It's creamy, almost lactonic, without the sharpness. Peach and rose are well-behaved underneath, soft, present.Twin for Women
    Some fragrances announce themselves. Noa doesn't need to. The coffee note gives it warmth where others go linear, and that powdery finish keeps drawing you back. Weightless, yes.Noa

    The hunt

    Best price, size by size

    Best price by size: Twin for Women vs. Noa
    Twin for WomenNoa
    1 oz$17.95fragranceshop
    1.7 oz$22.95fragranceshop
    2.7 oz$17.95fragranceshop
    3.4 oz$23.95fragranceshop

    Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.