
Wanderer
AjmalEau de Parfum2020
Side by side
Wanderer rates higher with the community, while Touch for Men wears longer on skin.
This match is computed by our similarity model. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Wanderer | Touch for Men | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2020 | 2000 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | — | Jean-Pierre Bethouart |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Wanderer
Touch for Men
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| Wanderer | Touch for Men | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
Ajmal made a fragrance with something to say. The white florals in the heart, freesia and lily of the valley, provide an unexpected dimension that catches attention.Wanderer
Touch for Men occupies a comfortable middle ground. It projects well enough to be noticed but never shouts. The opening is refreshing, but the real story is the warm heart that develops over a few.Touch for Men
Good to know