Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Eat Flowers vs. Central Park West

    Very similar
    New comparison

    Eat Flowers rates higher with the community, while Central Park West wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Eat Flowers vs. Central Park West
    Eat FlowersCentral Park West
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Parfum
    Launched20182012
    GenderUnisexUnisex
    PerfumerSarah McCartneyLaurent Le Guernec
    Best seasonSpringSpring

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Eat Flowers

    White Floral
    Woody
    Powdery
    Yellow Floral
    Iris
    Floral
    Sweet
    Rose

    Central Park West

    White Floral
    Yellow Floral
    Woody
    Sweet
    Green
    Lactonic
    Earthy
    Powdery

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    Linden BlossomLemon BlossomNeroli
    Ylang-YlangNarcissusBlack Pepper
    Heart
    IrisLilyTuberoseRoseGeranium
    GardeniaJasmineLinden BlossomOrris Root
    Base
    Cabreuva WoodWoody NotesMusk
    MuskVetiverWhite OakOakmoss

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Eat Flowers vs. Central Park West
    Eat FlowersCentral Park West
    Score3.5/53/5
    Longevity4-6 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagestrongstrong

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Some fragrances want to start arguments. Eat Flowers wants you to stop and breathe deeply, possibly at a flower market, definitely somewhere sunny. It's iris-forward in a way that could read.Eat Flowers
    This is a white floral with a green bite. Not the safe, creamy gardenia you might expect, it opens sharp, almost botanical, then softens into something powdery and lasting.Central Park West

    The hunt

    Best price, size by size

    Best price by size: Eat Flowers vs. Central Park West
    Eat FlowersCentral Park West
    3.4 oz$199.49fragrancenet

    Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.