Sweet Cocconut
1973Eau de Toilette1973
Side by side
Sweet Cocconut vs. Ummagumma
Ummagumma rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| Sweet Cocconut | Ummagumma | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 1973 | 2017 |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Rosario Cerullo | Bruno Fazzolari |
| Best season | Summer | Winter |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Sweet Cocconut
Coconut
Sweet
Vanilla
Lactonic
Tropical
Nutty
Ummagumma
Amber
Warm Spicy
Woody
Sweet
Tobacco
Chocolate
Vanilla
Leather
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Whipped Cream
Dark ChocolateSaffronCarnation
Heart—
LabdanumTobaccoLeatherSandalwood
Base
VanillaHoneyCoconut Milk
FrankincenseCedarVanillaTonka Bean
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Sweet Cocconut | Ummagumma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Some will smell this and think beach vacation. Others will think dessert course. Both are right. Sweet Coconut doesn't evolve dramatically, but it doesn't need to, the real trick is that coconut note.Sweet Cocconut
Most gourmand fragrances are content to smell good. Ummagumma wants more, it's chocolate and vanilla woven into tobacco and amber, sharpened by saffron, grounded by frankincense.Ummagumma