Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Matthew Miller vs. Santal 33

    Clearly related
    New comparison

    Santal 33 wears longer on skin, while Matthew Miller projects louder.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Matthew Miller vs. Santal 33
    Matthew MillerSantal 33
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Parfum
    Launched20182011
    GenderUnisexUnisex
    PerfumerMark BuxtonFrank Voelkl
    Best seasonFallFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Matthew Miller

    Smoky
    Aromatic
    Amber
    Green
    Woody
    Fresh Spicy
    Herbal
    Cannabis

    Santal 33

    Woody
    Leather
    Powdery
    Warm Spicy
    Violet
    Spicy
    Green
    Leathery

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    BasilBlackcurrant
    Cardamom
    Heart
    IncenseHemp
    LeatherIrisViolet
    Base
    SmokeVetiverLeather
    SandalwoodVirginia CedarPapyrusAmber

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Matthew Miller vs. Santal 33
    Matthew MillerSantal 33
    Score3.5/53.5/5
    Longevity4-6 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagestrongmoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Basil and blackcurrant arrive sharp. Incense follows. The smoke-leather drydown isn't loud, it doesn't need to be. This is for someone who doesn't need the room to know.Matthew Miller
    This fragrance is less a perfume and more an atmospheric event. The sandalwood is the anchor but the leather and papyrus make it interesting. Not everyone will appreciate the slightly feral quality.Santal 33

    The hunt

    Best price, size by size

    Best price by size: Matthew Miller vs. Santal 33
    Matthew MillerSantal 33
    0.5 oz$120.36ecosmetics
    1.7 oz$273.36ecosmetics
    3.4 oz$435.20ecosmetics

    Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.