Pure Tiffany
Tiffany2003
Side by side
Pure Tiffany vs. New York for Ladies
New York for Ladies wears longer on skin, while Pure Tiffany projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| Pure Tiffany | New York for Ladies | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | — | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2003 | 2008 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Jacques Polge | Ilias Ermenidis |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Pure Tiffany
Floral
White Floral
Fresh
Aquatic
Citrus
Tuberose
New York for Ladies
White Floral
Floral
Woody
Citrus
Green
Tuberose
Fresh Spicy
Sweet
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Bergamot
BergamotHyacinthFreesia
Heart
Water LilyJasmineMagnoliaLilacTuberose
TuberoseOrange BlossomJasmineIrisOrris RootRosewood
Base
Sandalwood
MuskWoody Notes
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Pure Tiffany | New York for Ladies | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Five white flowers in one bottle should overwhelm. It doesn't. Pure Tiffany keeps them arranged so neatly they feel effortless, like a jewelry setting that hides the engineering.Pure Tiffany
Clean enough to wear anywhere. White florals that don't shout. The kind of scent that gets remembered by the people who matter, close enough to notice, polite enough to let you leave the room first.New York for Ladies