
Taylor
Taylor SwiftEau de Parfum2013
Side by side


Osmanthus Eau de Parfum rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Taylor | Osmanthus Eau de Parfum | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2013 | 2021 |
| Gender | Female | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Harry Frémont | — |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Taylor
Osmanthus Eau de Parfum
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Taylor | Osmanthus Eau de Parfum | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Sweet and accessible by design. That's not a flaw, it's the whole point. When a fragrance is this easy to wear, it becomes the one you reach for when you want to smell like yourself, not like a scent.Taylor
This is the fragrance for someone who doesn't need osmanthus explained to them. The apricot-powder warmth wraps around the white florals like a second skin, warm, immediate, easy to wear every day.Osmanthus Eau de Parfum
Keep comparing
TaylorvsBella Essence82%
TaylorvsFancy Love80%
Osmanthus Eau de ParfumvsGood Girl Gone Bad78%
Osmanthus Eau de ParfumvsThe Queen of Sheba78%
Osmanthus Eau de ParfumvsSunshine Woman77%
Osmanthus Eau de ParfumvsNarciso Rodriguez For Her Forever77%
TaylorvsBurberry Women75%
Osmanthus Eau de ParfumvsPêche Mirage75%Good to know