
Stella (2014)
Stella McCartneyEau de Parfum2014
Side by side


Stella (2014) rates higher with the community, while Miss Charming wears longer on skin.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Stella (2014) | Miss Charming | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2014 | 2006 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Jacques Cavallier Belletrud | Francis Kurkdjian |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Stella (2014)
Miss Charming
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Stella (2014) | Miss Charming | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Rose and amber is a classic pairing, but most versions feel either too soft or too heavy. Stella threads the needle, peony keeps the rose from getting too serious.Stella (2014)
It's fruity, it's floral, it reads innocent. But there's a musk here that shifts the whole thing, suddenly you're not sure if she's sweet or just patient. That's the trick. That's what makes it work.Miss Charming
The hunt
| Stella (2014) | Miss Charming | |
|---|---|---|
| 8ml | — | $16.09fragrancenet |
| 1.7 oz | — | $85.99ecosmetics |
| 3.3 oz | — | $150.00ecosmetics |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Keep comparing
Good to know