Skip to main content
    Silloria
    BrandsNotesPerfumers
    Log inSign up

    Side by side

    1775 Classic For Men vs. Echo

    Very similar
    Echo by Davidoff bottle

    Echo

    Davidoff
    Eau de Toilette2003
    New comparison

    1775 Classic For Men rates higher with the community, while Echo wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: 1775 Classic For Men vs. Echo
    1775 Classic For MenEcho
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Toilette
    Launched20142003
    GenderMaleMale
    Perfumer—Alain Astori, Pierre Wargnye, Béatrice Piquet
    Best seasonSummerSpring

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    1775 Classic For Men

    Aromatic
    Fresh Spicy
    Woody
    Musky
    Amber
    Citrus
    Lavender
    Herbal

    Echo

    Fresh Spicy
    Woody
    Warm Spicy
    Musky
    Powdery
    Leather

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    LimeBergamotMandarin Orange
    AldehydesWater Notes
    Heart
    LavenderRosemarySage
    NutmegBlack PepperChili Pepper
    Base
    AmberMuskCypress
    CedarMuskSandalwoodWhite Suede

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: 1775 Classic For Men vs. Echo
    1775 Classic For MenEcho
    Score3.5/53/5
    Longevity2-4 hours4-6 hours
    Sillagestrongmoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    A well-mannered fragrance. Nothing shouts. Nothing shocks. The citrus opens crisp, the herbs arrive on time, and the drydown earns its keep. If you want a scent that knows when to leave the room.1775 Classic For Men
    Davidoff built Echo as the daytime counterpart to Cool Water. The suede note is the real story here, it keeps the aquatic nature from feeling generic. Solid for work but the drydown becomes intimate.Echo