Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Baghari 2006 vs. Chanel N°22

    Strikingly similar
    New comparison

    Chanel N°22 rates higher with the community.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Baghari 2006 vs. Chanel N°22
    Baghari 2006Chanel N°22
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumParfum
    Launched20061922
    GenderFemaleFemale
    PerfumerAurélien GuichardErnest Beaux
    Best seasonFallWinter

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Baghari 2006

    Aldehydic
    Fresh
    Amber
    Rose
    Vanilla
    Musky
    Powdery
    White Floral

    Chanel N°22

    White Floral
    Fresh
    Aldehydic
    Yellow Floral
    Floral
    Sweet
    Iris
    Woody

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    AldehydesCitruses
    AldehydesOrange BlossomNeroliLily of the ValleyTuberose
    Heart
    IrisRoseJasmine
    Ylang-YlangJasmineWhite RoseNutmeg
    Base
    VanillaAmberMusk
    FrankincenseIrisVanillaVetiver

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Baghari 2006 vs. Chanel N°22
    Baghari 2006Chanel N°22
    Score4/54.5/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatestrong

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Baghari opens with aldehydes that hit sharp and soapy at first, a bright, clean impression that announces itself confidently. The rose-iris heart unfolds with powdery elegance.Baghari 2006
    N°22 doesn't do subtlety for the first hour. Aldehydes crackle, florals lean heavy, and there's an austere mineral coolness underneath that some find regal and others find challenging.Chanel N°22