Bling Bling
RevlonEau de Toilette2010
Side by side
Bling Bling vs. 212 Sexy
Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.
The essentials
At a glance
| Bling Bling | 212 Sexy | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2010 | 2004 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | — | Alberto Morillas, Rosendo Mateu |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Bling Bling
Citrus
White Floral
Powdery
Woody
Rose
Fresh
Floral
Musky
212 Sexy
Sweet
Powdery
Musky
Caramel
Vanilla
Soft Spicy
Floral
Citrus
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
BergamotBlackcurrantOrange
Pink PepperBergamotMandarin Orange
Heart
JasmineRoseLily of the Valley
GardeniaFloral Notes
Base
AmberMuskSandalwoodVanilla
Cotton CandyVanillaWhite MuskSandalwood
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Bling Bling | 212 Sexy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Here's the thing about Bling Bling: it's not pretending to be anything other than what it is, a confident, warm floral that knows how to wear itself well. The powdery drydown is its quiet flex.Bling Bling
Sweet enough to register. Warm enough to linger. What saves 212 Sexy from being another vanilla bomb is the gardenia, it keeps things lifted, almost fresh, even as the cotton candy settles in.212 Sexy
The hunt
Best price, size by size
| Bling Bling | 212 Sexy | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.27 oz | — | $14.69fragrancenet |
| 2 oz | — | $57.95fragranceshop |
| 3.4 oz | — | $53.95fragranceshop |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.