Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Flowing vs. Brilliant Wish

    Flowing by Puma bottle

    Flowing

    Puma
    Eau de Toilette2003
    Clearly related
    New comparison

    Brilliant Wish rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Flowing vs. Brilliant Wish
    FlowingBrilliant Wish
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Toilette
    Launched20032010
    GenderFemaleFemale
    PerfumerLouise Turner, Michel Girard
    Best seasonSpringFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Flowing

    Powdery
    Violet
    Fruity
    Floral
    Sweet
    Woody
    Iris
    Yellow Floral

    Brilliant Wish

    Amber
    Woody
    White Floral
    Musky
    Soft Spicy
    Fruity
    Sweet
    Powdery

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    RaspberryFreesiaMandarin OrangeBlackcurrant
    Pink PepperRed BerriesFruity Notes
    Heart
    VioletIrisMimosaYlang-Ylang
    Star JasmineViolet Leaf
    Base
    VanillaSandalwoodMuskAmber
    AmberWoody NotesMusk

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Flowing vs. Brilliant Wish
    FlowingBrilliant Wish
    Score3/53.5/5
    Longevity4-6 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Puma Flowing leans into its powdery iris heart like it means it. That's the move here, and the fragrance knows it. Fruity-sweet at the opening, warm and close by the drydown.Flowing
    This is for the woman who doesn't need to fill the room. The sillage is moderate, close, intimate, a secret between two people. If you want to be smelled from across the street.Brilliant Wish

    The hunt

    Best price, size by size

    Best price by size: Flowing vs. Brilliant Wish
    FlowingBrilliant Wish
    2.5 oz$24.49fragrancenet
    Best offer$41.98ecosmetics

    Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.