Nina Pop
Nina RicciEau de Toilette2015
Side by side
Nina Pop vs. Eau de Iceberg Pour Femme
Nina Pop rates higher with the community, while Eau de Iceberg Pour Femme wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| Nina Pop | Eau de Iceberg Pour Femme | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2015 | 2010 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | — | Nathalie Feisthauer |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Nina Pop
Fresh
Citrus
Woody
Fruity
Sweet
Floral
Green
Musky
Eau de Iceberg Pour Femme
Fruity
Sweet
White Floral
Floral
Citrus
Fresh
Vanilla
Woody
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
LimeLemon
Blood OrangePearPineapple
Heart
PralinePeonyDatura
FigFreesiaJasmine
Base
AppleMuskCedar
MuskVanillaWoody Notes
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Nina Pop | Eau de Iceberg Pour Femme | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Nina Pop does what it says on the tin. Fresh, fruity, undeniably feminine without tipping into girlish. The apple keeps it grounded, giving the sweetness something to lean against.Nina Pop
Fig and white florals give it more depth than most fruity fragrances. Not trying to reinvent anything, just does its job well, day after day. The pineapple and pear keep it from getting too heavy.Eau de Iceberg Pour Femme