Skip to main content
    HousesNotesPerfumers

    Side by side

    Mohawk vs. Polo

    Very similar
    Polo by Ralph Lauren bottle

    Polo

    Ralph Lauren
    Eau de Toilette1978
    New comparison

    Polo rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Mohawk vs. Polo
    MohawkPolo
    Concentration—Eau de Toilette
    Launched20141978
    GenderMaleMale
    Perfumer—Carlos Benaïm
    Best seasonFallFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Mohawk

    Woody
    Aromatic
    Earthy
    Mossy
    Patchouli
    Green
    Herbal
    Tobacco

    Polo

    Woody
    Aromatic
    Fresh Spicy
    Earthy
    Tobacco
    Mossy
    Green
    Sweet

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    Pine TreeChamomileLavender
    Juniper BerriesBasilBergamotCorianderCarawayTarragon
    Heart
    BasilCorianderGalbanum
    Pine Tree NeedlesLeatherCarnationGeraniumChamomilePepperJasmineRose
    Base
    OakmossPatchouliTobaccoLeather
    OakmossTobaccoCedarMuskPatchouliVetiverAmber

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Mohawk vs. Polo
    MohawkPolo
    Score3.5/54/5
    Longevity2-4 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagestrongstrong

    No varnish

    Real talk

    The chamomile either intrigues you or makes you pause. That's the opening. But if you're still reading: the drydown, oakmoss, leather, tobacco, is worth the gamble. Mohawk rewards curiosity.Mohawk
    Polo is not trying to impress anyone. This is a well-built masculine that knows exactly what it is, and has never needed to apologize for being a classic.Polo

    The hunt

    Best price, size by size

    Best price by size: Mohawk vs. Polo
    MohawkPolo
    0.27 oz—$11.89fragrancenet
    2 oz—$46.19fragrancenet
    4 oz—$67.33ecosmetics

    Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.